l9n/ Oregon

2007 Regular Session

House Bill 2123

Provides that court may not declare rule invalid in facial challenge to rule because rule could be applied in manner that violates constitutional provision, statute or statewide planning goal.

Did not become law. It stopped in the House of Representatives's Judiciary Committee on June 28, 2007. The 2007 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

Provides that court may not declare rule invalid in facial challenge to rule because rule could be applied in manner that violates constitutional provision, statute or statewide planning goal.

Its course

January 8 to June 28, 2007, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action4 actions on 4 days

In the House of RepresentativesJan 8 to Jun 28 · stopped171 days

Waiting for a committeeJan 8 to Jan 91 day

JudiciaryJan 9 to Jun 28 · stopped170 days

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Jan 8 – Jun 28

  1. Introduced
  2. Sent to Judiciary
  3. Heard in Judiciary
  4. Died when the session ended
All 4 actions, as published