l9n/ Oregon

2007 Regular Session

House Bill 2417

Directs State Court Administrator to prepare report every two years on compensation of state judges.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate's Rules Committee on June 28, 2007. The 2007 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

Directs State Court Administrator to prepare report every two years on compensation of state judges. Requires that report include computation of average compensation paid in other states to judges with closely equivalent responsibilities. Requires that State Court Administrator include statement of amounts needed during immediately following biennium to increase compensation of Oregon judges to equal average compensation received by judges with equivalent responsibilities in other states.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

Its course

January 10 to June 28, 2007, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action12 actions on 11 days

In the House of RepresentativesJan 10 to Feb 2647 days

Waiting for a committeeJan 10 to Jan 177 days

Government Accountability and Information TechnologyJan 17 to Feb 2135 days

In the SenateFeb 26 to Jun 28 · stopped122 days

Waiting for a committeeFeb 26 to Mar 79 days

JudiciaryMar 7 to Jun 186 days

RulesJun 1 to Jun 28 · stopped27 days

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

  • House of Representatives, third reading57–0

    Passed · Feb 26 · 3 present

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Jan 10 – Feb 26

  1. Jan 10Introduced
  2. Jan 17Sent to Government Accountability and Information Technology
  3. Feb 15Heard in Government Accountability and Information Technology
  4. Feb 21Government Accountability and Information Technology recommended it
  5. Feb 22Read a second time
  6. Feb 26Passed the House of Representatives, 57 to 0

In the Senate Feb 28 – Jun 28

  1. Feb 28Arrived in the Senate
  2. Mar 7Sent to Judiciary
  3. May 30Heard in Judiciary
  4. Jun 1Judiciary reported it without a recommendation, and that it go to Rules
  5. Sent to Rules
  6. Jun 28Died when the session ended
All 12 actions, as published
  1. Jan 10First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.House of Representatives
  2. Jan 17Referred to Government Accountability and Information Technology.House of Representatives
  3. Feb 15Public Hearing and Work Session held.House of Representatives
  4. Feb 21Recommendation: Do pass.House of Representatives
  5. Feb 22Second reading.House of Representatives
  6. Feb 26Third reading. Carried by Beyer. Passed.House of Representatives
  7. Feb 28First reading. Referred to President's desk.Senate
  8. Mar 7Referred to Judiciary.Senate
  9. May 30Work Session held.Senate
  10. Jun 1Recommendation: Without recommendation as to passage and be referred to Rules.Senate
  11. Jun 1Referred to Rules by order of the President.Senate
  12. Jun 28In committee upon adjournment.Senate