l9n/ Oregon

2007 Regular Session

Senate Bill 506

Requires that direct medical sequelae identified by medical arbiter during reconsideration of workers' compensation claim be processed as new or omitted medical condition.

Did not become law. It stopped in the House of Representatives's Elections, Ethics and Rules Committee on June 28, 2007. The 2007 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

<i>Defines "direct medical sequelae" for purposes of workers' compensation claims.</i>] <b>Requires that direct medical sequelae identified by medical arbiter during reconsideration of workers' compensation claim be processed as new or omitted medical condition.</b>

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

    1 co-sponsor

    SBTW

    Its course

    February 5 to June 28, 2007, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

    Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

    Every action17 actions on 16 days

    In the SenateFeb 5 to May 993 days

    Waiting for a committeeFeb 5 to Feb 127 days

    CommerceFeb 12 to May 784 days

    In the House of RepresentativesMay 9 to Jun 28 · stopped50 days

    Waiting for a committeeMay 9 to May 112 days

    Business and LaborMay 11 to Jun 424 days

    Elections, Ethics and RulesJun 8 to Jun 28 · stopped20 days

    Votes

    Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

    • Senate, third reading29–1

      Passed · May 9

    Amendments

    Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

    • Senate committee amendmentAdopted

      Adopted May 7

    • House of Representatives committee amendmentAdopted

      Adopted Jun 4

    Text

    Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

    l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

    What happened

    In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

    In the Senate Feb 5 – May 9

    1. Feb 5Introduced
    2. Feb 12Sent to Commerce
    3. Apr 25Heard in Commerce
    4. Apr 30Heard in Commerce
    5. May 7Commerce recommended it as amended
    6. May 8Read a second time
    7. May 9Passed the Senate, 29 to 1

    In the House of Representatives May 10 – Jun 28

    1. May 10Arrived in the House of Representatives
    2. May 11Sent to Business and Labor
    3. May 16Heard in Business and Labor
    4. May 30Heard in Business and Labor
    5. Jun 4Business and Labor recommended it as amended
    6. Jun 6Read a second time
    7. Jun 8Read a third time
    8. Sent to Elections, Ethics and Rules
    9. Jun 28Died when the session ended
    All 17 actions, as published
    1. Feb 5Introduction and first reading. Referred to President's desk.Senate
    2. Feb 12Referred to Commerce.Senate
    3. Apr 25Public Hearing held.Senate
    4. Apr 30Work Session held.Senate
    5. May 7Recommendation: Do pass with amendments. (Printed A-Eng.)Senate
    6. May 8Second reading.Senate
    7. May 9Third reading. Carried by Prozanski. Passed.Senate
    8. May 10First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.House of Representatives
    9. May 11Referred to Business and Labor.House of Representatives
    10. May 16Public Hearing held.House of Representatives
    11. May 30Work Session held.House of Representatives
    12. Jun 4Recommendation: Do pass with amendments and be printed B-Engrossed.House of Representatives
    13. Jun 6Second reading.House of Representatives
    14. Jun 7Rules suspended. Carried over to June 8, 2007 Calendar.House of Representatives
    15. Jun 8Third reading.House of Representatives
    16. Jun 8Motion to refer to Elections, Ethics and Rules carried. Referred.House of Representatives
    17. Jun 28In committee upon adjournment.House of Representatives