l9n/ Oregon

2007 Regular Session

Senate Bill 669

Imposes pleading requirements for professional liability claims.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate's Judiciary Committee on June 28, 2007. The 2007 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

Imposes pleading requirements for professional liability claims. Requires that claim be accompanied by certification by claimant's attorney stating that attorney has consulted person who holds same license, registration or certificate as defendant and who is qualified, available and willing to testify to admissible facts and opinions sufficient to create question of fact as to professional liability. Specifies exception. Mandates settlement conference in action in which professional liability claim is made. Allows defendant in professional liability claim to request impaneling of common sense jury if claim is for more than $50,000. Requires award of reasonable attorney fees to defendant if common sense jury determines that claim is meritless and plaintiff does not receive money award at trial.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

Its course

February 26 to June 28, 2007, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action3 actions on 3 days

In the SenateFeb 26 to Jun 28 · stopped122 days

Waiting for a committeeFeb 26 to Feb 282 days

JudiciaryFeb 28 to Jun 28 · stopped120 days

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the Senate Feb 26 – Jun 28

  1. Introduced
  2. Sent to Judiciary
  3. Died when the session ended
All 3 actions, as published