l9n/ Oregon

2007 Regular Session

Senate Bill 670

Provides that upon offer of expert scientific evidence at trial, court must first determine whether theory or technique supporting offered evidence is based on scientifically valid principles and is pertinent.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate's Judiciary Committee on June 28, 2007. The 2007 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

Provides that upon offer of expert scientific evidence at trial, court must first determine whether theory or technique supporting offered evidence is based on scientifically valid principles and is pertinent. Specifies factors court must use in determining whether theory or technique is based on scientifically valid principles. Provides that witness may not testify about scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge if compensation of witness is contingent on outcome of proceedings.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

Its course

February 26 to June 28, 2007, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action3 actions on 3 days

In the SenateFeb 26 to Jun 28 · stopped122 days

Waiting for a committeeFeb 26 to Feb 282 days

JudiciaryFeb 28 to Jun 28 · stopped120 days

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the Senate Feb 26 – Jun 28

  1. Introduced
  2. Sent to Judiciary
  3. Died when the session ended
All 3 actions, as published