l9n/ Oregon

2009 Regular Session

House Bill 2867

Requires contracting agency, before conducting procurement for services that exceed specified amount, to demonstrate by specified means that performing services with contracting agency's own personnel and services is not feasible or to demonstrate by means of written cost analysis that contracting agency would incur less cost in procuring services than in performing services with agency's own personnel and resources.

Became law as Chapter 880, Oregon Laws 2009, signed August 4, 2009, 154 days after it was filed. In force from August 4, 2009.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

Requires contracting agency, before conducting procurement for services that exceed specified amount, to demonstrate by specified means that performing services with contracting agency's own personnel and services is not feasible or to demonstrate by means of written cost analysis that contracting agency would incur less cost in procuring services than in performing services with agency's own personnel and resources. Applies requirement to local contracting agency that authorizes certain entities to procure services. Creates exceptions. Specifies method by which contracting agency must perform cost analysis. Directs Oregon Department of Administrative Services to consult with contracting agencies and evaluate new requirements. Directs department to report results of consultation and evaluation to Legislative Assembly on January 10, 2011. Modifies information that contracting agency must include in invitation to bid and request for proposals. Modifies and creates other provisions related to public contracting. Declares emergency, effective on passage.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

    1 co-sponsor

    HBL

    Its course

    March 3 to August 4, 2009, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

    Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

    Every action31 actions on 16 days

    In the House of RepresentativesMar 3 to Jun 25114 days

    Waiting for a committeeMar 3 to Mar 30 days

    Business and LaborMar 3 to Apr 1038 days

    RulesApr 10 to May 2949 days

    Ways and MeansMay 29 to Jun 2 · moved on4 days

    Capital Construction and Information TechnologyJun 2 to Jun 22 · moved on20 days

    In the SenateJun 25 to Jun 294 days

    Waiting for a committeeJun 25 to Jun 250 days

    Ways and MeansJun 25 to Jun 294 days

    Back in the House of RepresentativesJun 29 to Jul 1314 days

    With the GovernorJul 13 to Aug 422 days

    Votes

    Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

    • House of Representatives, third reading45–13

      Passed · Jun 25 · 2 present

    • Senate, third reading19–10

      Passed · Jun 29 · 1 present

    • House of Representatives, concurrence39–20

      Agreed to the other chamber's changes · Jun 29 · 1 present

    Amendments

    Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

    • House of Representatives committee amendmentAdopted

      Adopted May 29

    • House of Representatives committee amendmentAdopted

      Adopted Jun 24

    • Senate committee amendmentAdopted

      Adopted Jun 29

    Text

    Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

    l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

    What happened

    In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

    In the House of Representatives Mar 3 – Jun 25

    1. Introduced
    2. Sent to Business and Labor
    3. Heard in Business and Labor
    4. Heard in Business and Labor
    5. Business and Labor reported it without a recommendation, and that it go to Rules
    6. Sent to Rules
    7. Heard in Rules
    8. Heard in Rules
    9. Heard in Rules
    10. Rules recommended it as amended, and that it go to Ways and Means
    11. Sent to Ways and Means
    12. Sent to Capital Construction and Information Technology Subcommittee
    13. Heard in Capital Construction and Information Technology Subcommittee
    14. Returned to Ways and Means
    15. Heard in Ways and Means
    16. Ways and Means recommended it as amended
    17. Read a second time
    18. Passed the House of Representatives, 45 to 13

    In the Senate Jun 25 – Jun 29

    1. Arrived in the Senate
    2. Sent to Ways and Means
    3. Heard in Ways and Means
    4. Ways and Means recommended it as amended
    5. Read a second time
    6. Passed the Senate, 19 to 10

    Back in the House of Representatives Jun 29 – Jul 13

    1. The House of Representatives agreed to the Senate's amendments and passed it again, 39 to 20
    2. Signed in the House of Representatives

    To the Governor Jul 13 – Aug 4

    1. Signed in the Senate
    2. Signed by the Governor
    3. Became chapter 880 of Oregon Laws 2009, in force from August 4, 2009
    All 31 actions, as published