l9n/ Oregon

2009 Regular Session

House Bill 3051

Makes valid chemical analysis of person's urine admissible at trial as evidence of whether person was driving while under influence of intoxicants.

Became law as Chapter 325, Oregon Laws 2009, signed June 17, 2009, 100 days after it was filed. In force from January 1, 2010.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

<i>Requires permanent revocation of driving privileges for persons convicted of driving while under influence of intoxicants.</i>] <i>Increases amount of time person must use ignition interlock device after ending date of revocation of driving privileges for conviction of driving while under influence of intoxicants.</i>] <i>Increases penalty for offense of unlawfully soliciting another to blow into ignition interlock device or start motor vehicle equipped with ignition interlock device. Punishes by maximum of six months' imprisonment, $2,500 fine, or both.</i>] <i>Increases penalty for offense of tampering with ignition interlock device. Punishes by maximum of six months' imprisonment, $2,500 fine, or both.</i>] <i>Requires person ordered to install ignition interlock device to report to court within 30 days of order.</i>] <i>Requires provider of ignition interlock devices to provide reports generated by device to court and district attorney.</i>] <b>Makes valid chemical analysis of person's urine admissible at trial as evidence of whether person was driving while under influence of intoxicants. Specifies that chemical analysis is valid if performed by accredited or licensed toxicology laboratory.</b>

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

    1 co-sponsor

    HJUD

    Its course

    March 9 to June 17, 2009, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

    Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

    Every action17 actions on 14 days

    In the House of RepresentativesMar 9 to May 153 days

    Waiting for a committeeMar 9 to Mar 112 days

    JudiciaryMar 11 to Apr 2949 days

    In the SenateMay 1 to May 2221 days

    Waiting for a committeeMay 1 to May 76 days

    JudiciaryMay 7 to May 2013 days

    With the GovernorMay 22 to Jun 1726 days

    Votes

    Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

    • House of Representatives, third reading46–0

      Passed · May 1 · 14 present

    • Senate, third reading26–0

      Passed · May 22 · 4 present

    Amendments

    Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

    • House of Representatives committee amendmentAdopted

      Adopted Apr 29

    Text

    Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

    l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

    What happened

    In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

    In the House of Representatives Mar 9 – May 1

    1. Introduced
    2. Sent to Judiciary
    3. Heard in Judiciary
    4. Judiciary recommended it as amended
    5. Read a second time
    6. Passed the House of Representatives, 46 to 0

    In the Senate May 4 – May 22

    1. Arrived in the Senate
    2. Sent to Judiciary
    3. Heard in Judiciary
    4. Judiciary recommended it
    5. Read a second time
    6. Passed the Senate, 26 to 0

    To the Governor Jun 11 – Jun 17

    1. Signed in the House of Representatives
    2. Signed in the Senate
    3. Signed by the Governor
    4. Became chapter 325 of Oregon Laws 2009, in force from January 1, 2010
    All 17 actions, as published