l9n/ Oregon

2011 Regular Session

House Bill 2690

Allows Chief Justice of Supreme Court to adopt rules governing use of electronic applications for all records of courts and for transmission of jury information to circuit courts.

Did not become law. It stopped in the House of Representatives's Public Safety Committee on June 30, 2011. The 2011 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

Allows Chief Justice of Supreme Court to adopt rules governing use of electronic applications for all records of courts and for transmission of jury information to circuit courts. Allows Chief Justice to establish reasonable subscription fees, and other user and transaction fees, for remote access to case information and other Judicial Department forms, reports and services that are available in electronic form. Provides that master jury list for county may be composed of all names on source lists or group of randomly selected names from source lists. Allows State Court Administrator to establish procedures for destruction of state court records, not just circuit court records. Modifies laws on filing of transcript on appeal to allow electronic filing of transcript. Declares emergency, effective on passage.

Its course

January 11 to June 30, 2011, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action9 actions on 8 days

In the House of RepresentativesJan 11 to Jun 30 · stopped170 days

Waiting for a committeeJan 11 to Jan 2110 days

JudiciaryJan 21 to Mar 2967 days

Ways and MeansMar 29 to May 3 · moved on35 days

Public SafetyMay 3 to Jun 30 · stopped58 days

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • House of Representatives committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Mar 29

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Jan 11 – Jun 30

  1. Jan 11Introduced
  2. Jan 21Sent to Judiciary
  3. Mar 1Heard in Judiciary
  4. Mar 22Heard in Judiciary
  5. Mar 29Judiciary recommended it as amended, and that it go to Ways and Means
  6. Sent to Ways and Means
  7. May 3Sent to Public Safety Subcommittee
  8. May 11Heard in Public Safety Subcommittee
  9. Jun 30Died when the session ended
All 9 actions, as published
  1. Jan 11First reading. Referred to the desks of the Co-Speakers.House of Representatives
  2. Jan 21Referred to Judiciary with subsequent referral to Ways and Means.House of Representatives
  3. Mar 1Public Hearing held.House of Representatives
  4. Mar 22Work Session held.House of Representatives
  5. Mar 29Recommendation: Do pass with amendments, be printed A-Engrossed, and be referred to Ways and Means by prior reference.House of Representatives
  6. Mar 29Referred to Ways and Means by prior reference.House of Representatives
  7. May 3Assigned to Subcommittee On Public Safety.House of Representatives
  8. May 11Public Hearing held.House of Representatives
  9. Jun 30In committee upon adjournment.House of Representatives