l9n/ Oregon

2011 Regular Session

House Bill 2945

Prohibits city or district from requiring consent by landowner to eventual annexation in exchange for providing extraterritorial service when city or district is providing service on behalf of another local government pursuant to intergovernmental agreement.

Did not become law. It stopped in the House of Representatives's Rules Committee on June 30, 2011. The 2011 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

Prohibits city or district from requiring consent by landowner to eventual annexation in exchange for providing extraterritorial service when city or district is providing service on behalf of another local government pursuant to intergovernmental agreement. Declares consent by landowner to annexation obtained by city or district prior to effective date of Act void if consent was demanded for service provided outside boundaries of city or district on behalf of another local government pursuant to intergovernmental agreement. Clarifies language authorizing city or district to require consent to eventual annexation in exchange for providing extraterritorial service to landowner.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

Its course

January 11 to June 30, 2011, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action7 actions on 6 days

In the House of RepresentativesJan 11 to Jun 30 · stopped170 days

Waiting for a committeeJan 11 to Jan 2110 days

RulesApr 25 to Jun 30 · stopped66 days

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Jan 11 – Jun 30

  1. Introduced
  2. Sent to General Government and Consumer Protection
  3. Heard in General Government and Consumer Protection
  4. Heard in General Government and Consumer Protection
  5. General Government and Consumer Protection reported it without a recommendation, and that it go to Rules
  6. Sent to Rules
  7. Died when the session ended
All 7 actions, as published