l9n/ Oregon

2013 Regular Session

Senate Bill 805

Permits employee of contracting agency that conducts cost analysis or determines feasibility of procurement, or exclusive representative of employee's bargaining unit, to seek judicial review of cost analysis or determination.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate's Rules Committee on July 8, 2013. The 2013 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

Permits employee of contracting agency that conducts cost analysis or determines feasibility of procurement, or exclusive representative of employee's bargaining unit, to seek judicial review of cost analysis or determination. Specifies conditions under which review may occur. <b>Requires contracting agency to take certain steps to obtain information necessary to conduct cost analysis before advertising or soliciting procurement. <b>Requires contracting agency to update cost analysis and to reconsider determination of feasibility of agency performing services that are subject to procurement under certain circumstances.</b> Requires contracting agency to consider contractor's profit in cost analysis. Prohibits contracting agency from considering proceeds of sale or costs of replacing long-term assets in cost analysis. Becomes operative January 1, 2014. Declares emergency, effective on passage.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

3 co-sponsors

Rod Monroe, Arnie Roblan, Chip Shields

In the House of Representatives

13 co-sponsors

Phil Barnhart, Brent Barton, Brian Clem, Michael Dembrow, Margaret Doherty, Lew Frederick, Joe Gallegos, David Gomberg, Chris Gorsek, Paul Holvey, John Lively, Greg Matthews, Jeff Reardon

Its course

March 6 to July 8, 2013, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action12 actions on 10 days

In the SenateMar 6 to Jul 8 · stopped124 days

Waiting for a committeeMar 6 to Mar 137 days

General Government, Consumer and Small Business ProtectionMar 13 to Apr 1937 days

RulesApr 19 to Jul 173 days

RulesJul 3 to Jul 8 · stopped5 days

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • Senate committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Jul 1

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the Senate Mar 6 – Jul 8

  1. Mar 6Introduced
  2. Mar 13Sent to General Government, Consumer and Small Business Protection
  3. Apr 5Heard in General Government, Consumer and Small Business Protection
  4. Apr 17Heard in General Government, Consumer and Small Business Protection
  5. Apr 19General Government, Consumer and Small Business Protection reported it without a recommendation, and that it go to Rules
  6. Sent to Rules
  7. Jun 24Heard in Rules
  8. Jul 1Rules recommended it as amended
  9. Jul 2Read a second time
  10. Jul 3Sent to Rules
  11. Jul 8Died when the session ended
All 12 actions, as published
  1. Mar 6Introduction and first reading. Referred to President's desk.Senate
  2. Mar 13Referred to General Government, Consumer and Small Business Protection.Senate
  3. Apr 5Public Hearing held.Senate
  4. Apr 17Work Session held.Senate
  5. Apr 19Recommendation: Without recommendation as to passage and be referred to Rules.Senate
  6. Apr 19Referred to Rules by order of the President.Senate
  7. Jun 24Public Hearing and Work Session held.Senate
  8. Jul 1Recommendation: Do pass with amendments. (Printed A-Eng).Senate
  9. Jul 1Minority Recommendation: Do pass with different amendments. (Printed A-Eng. Minority)Senate
  10. Jul 2Second reading.Senate
  11. Jul 3Motion to rerefer to Rules carried on voice vote.Senate
  12. Jul 8In committee upon adjournment.Senate