l9n/ Oregon

2015 Regular Session

Senate Bill 316

Allows polygraph test as condition of employment for pre-employment screening of law enforcement officers.

Did not become law. It stopped in the House of Representatives's Judiciary Committee on July 6, 2015. The 2015 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

<i>Prohibits service provider from disclosing contents of communication and certain other information except in certain circumstances.</i>] <i>Prohibits public body from obtaining contents of communication and certain other information without search warrant except in certain circumstances.</i>] <i>Requires that public body provide notice to person if contents of communication or certain other information is obtained. Provides for delay of notification and prohibition on disclosure of warrant when ordered by court.</i>] <i>Provides that contents of communication and certain other information obtained in violation of Act are inadmissible in adjudicative proceeding. Requires that parties be provided with warrant and application when lawfully obtained contents or information is used in adjudicative proceeding.</i>] <i>Requires public body to issue annual report to Legislative Assembly if public body requests or obtains contents of communication or certain other information.</i>] <i>Creates cause of action for person harmed as result of violation of certain sections of Act.</i>] <i>Prohibits public body from obtaining customer information from pawnbroker without search warrant.</i>] <b>Allows polygraph test as condition of employment for pre-employment screening of law enforcement officers. Exempts polygraph test from inspection of public records.</b>

Its course

January 12 to July 6, 2015, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action10 actions on 10 days

In the SenateJan 12 to Apr 28106 days

Waiting for a committeeJan 12 to Jan 208 days

JudiciaryJan 20 to Apr 2393 days

In the House of RepresentativesApr 28 to Jul 6 · stopped69 days

Waiting for a committeeApr 28 to May 57 days

JudiciaryMay 5 to Jul 6 · stopped62 days

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

  • Senate, third reading29–1

    Passed · Apr 28

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • Senate committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Apr 23

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the Senate Jan 12 – Apr 28

  1. Jan 12Introduced
  2. Jan 20Sent to Judiciary
  3. Mar 17Heard in Judiciary
  4. Apr 21Heard in Judiciary
  5. Apr 23Judiciary recommended it as amended
  6. Apr 27Read a second time
  7. Apr 28Passed the Senate, 29 to 1

In the House of Representatives Apr 29 – Jul 6

  1. Apr 29Arrived in the House of Representatives
  2. May 5Sent to Judiciary
  3. Jul 6Died when the session ended
All 10 actions, as published
  1. Jan 12Introduction and first reading. Referred to President's desk.Senate
  2. Jan 20Referred to Judiciary.Senate
  3. Mar 17Public Hearing held.Senate
  4. Apr 21Work Session held.Senate
  5. Apr 23Recommendation: Do pass with amendments. (Printed A-Eng.)Senate
  6. Apr 27Second reading.Senate
  7. Apr 28Third reading. Carried by Prozanski. Passed.Senate
  8. Apr 29First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.House of Representatives
  9. May 5Referred to Judiciary.House of Representatives
  10. Jul 6In committee upon adjournment.House of Representatives