Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate's Rules Committee on July 6, 2015. The 2015 session has ended.
2015 Regular Session
Senate Bill 764
Requires agency to include comparative analysis of costs and benefits of rule in notice of proposed rulemaking.
What it does
The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.
Requires agency to include comparative analysis of costs and benefits of rule in notice of proposed rulemaking. Requires agency to appoint advisory committee if association or group of 10 or more individuals objects to comparative analysis of costs and benefits stated in notice.
Sponsors
Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.
In the Senate
Sponsor
Its course
February 26 to July 6, 2015, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.
Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.
Every action4 actions on 4 days
In the SenateFeb 26 to Jul 6 · stopped130 days
Waiting for a committeeFeb 26 to Mar 35 days
RulesMar 3 to Jul 6 · stopped125 days
Votes
Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.
Rules12–18
Jun 10
Text
Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.
l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.
What happened
In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.
In the Senate Feb 26 – Jul 6
- Feb 26Introduced
- Mar 3Sent to Rules
- Jul 6Died when the session ended