l9n/ Oregon

2016 Regular Session

House Bill 4087

Permits police officer or law enforcement unit to petition circuit court to require law enforcement unit to withhold from disclosure identifying information of police officer or police officer's immediate family if police officer or police officer's immediate family received credible threat of present danger to life of police officer or police officer's immediate family.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate's Rules Committee on March 3, 2016. The 2016 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

<i>Prohibits official action relating to employment or certification of police officer solely because police officer is on impeachment list or because of unproven allegation that police officer committed act or omission of kind for which name of police officer may be placed on impeachment list. Prohibits use of certain evidence regarding impeachment list in administrative hearing related to official action.</i>] <b>Permits police officer or law enforcement unit to petition circuit court to require law enforcement unit to withhold from disclosure identifying information of police officer or police officer's immediate family if police officer or police officer's immediate family received credible threat of present danger to life of police officer or police officer's immediate family. Specifies that identifying information under protective order may be withheld for 90 days. Permits police officer or law enforcement to request extension of protective order. Permits plaintiff who brings cause of action against law enforcement unit for act or omission committed by police officer whose identifying information is under protective order to petition court to release identifying information of police officer. Defines "law enforcement unit" and "police officer."</b> Declares emergency, effective on passage.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

3 co-sponsors

Chris Gorsek, Susan McLain, Jeff Reardon

In the Senate

    1 co-sponsor

    Laurie Monnes Anderson

    Its course

    January 27 to March 3, 2016, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

    Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

    Every action11 actions on 9 days

    In the House of RepresentativesJan 27 to Feb 1721 days

    Waiting for a committeeJan 27 to Feb 15 days

    JudiciaryFeb 1 to Feb 1514 days

    In the SenateFeb 17 to Mar 3 · stopped15 days

    Waiting for a committeeFeb 17 to Feb 181 day

    RulesFeb 18 to Mar 3 · stopped14 days

    Votes

    Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

    • House of Representatives, third reading55–3

      Passed · Feb 17 · 2 present

    Amendments

    Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

    • House of Representatives committee amendmentAdopted

      Adopted Feb 15

    Text

    Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

    l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

    What happened

    In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

    In the House of Representatives Jan 27 – Feb 17

    1. Filed before the session
    2. Introduced
    3. Sent to Judiciary
    4. Heard in Judiciary
    5. Heard in Judiciary
    6. Judiciary recommended it as amended
    7. Read a second time
    8. Passed the House of Representatives, 55 to 3

    In the Senate Feb 18 – Mar 3

    1. Arrived in the Senate
    2. Sent to Rules
    3. Died when the session ended
    All 11 actions, as published