l9n/ Oregon

2017 Regular Session

Senate Bill 605

Requires agency to include comparative analysis of costs and benefits of rule in notice of proposed rulemaking.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate's General Government and Accountability Committee on July 7, 2017. The 2017 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

Requires agency to include comparative analysis of costs and benefits of rule in notice of proposed rulemaking. Requires agency to appoint advisory committee if association or group of 10 or more individuals objects to comparative analysis of costs and benefits stated in notice.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

In the House of Representatives

    1 co-sponsor

    Mike Nearman

    Its course

    January 9 to July 7, 2017, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

    Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

    Every action4 actions on 4 days

    In the SenateJan 9 to Jul 7 · stopped179 days

    Waiting for a committeeJan 9 to Jan 178 days

    General Government and AccountabilityJan 17 to Jul 7 · stopped171 days

    Text

    Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

    l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

    What happened

    In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

    In the Senate Jan 9 – Jul 7

    1. Jan 9Introduced
    2. Jan 17Sent to General Government and Accountability
    3. Apr 5Heard in General Government and Accountability
    4. Jul 7Died when the session ended
    All 4 actions, as published
    1. Jan 9Introduction and first reading. Referred to President's desk.Senate
    2. Jan 17Referred to General Government and Accountability.Senate
    3. Apr 5Public Hearing held.Senate
    4. Jul 7In committee upon adjournment.Senate